Guilford Park Presbyterian Church
2100 FERNWOOD DRIVE
​GREENSBORO, NC 27408
CHURCH: 336-288-5452
PRESCHOOL 336-282-6697


  • HOME
  • WORSHIP
    • Bulletins
    • How to Join
    • Music
    • Sermons
    • Live Stream
    • Weddings and Funerals
  • Live Stream
  • ABOUT
    • What We Believe
    • Staff
    • History >
      • Yearly History
    • Leadership
    • What to Expect
    • Our Affiliations
  • Education
    • Children >
      • Vacation Bible School
    • Youth
    • Adults
  • SERVE
    • In the Congregation
    • In the Community
    • In the World
    • Member Connect
    • Giving
  • PODCAST
  • Blog
  • PRESCHOOL
    • Preschool New Home
  • NEWS
    • eNews
    • Guidepost Newsletter
    • Pictorial Directory
    • PC(USA) News
    • GPPC Articles
    • Church Manual
  • CONNECT
    • Fellowship Events
    • Fellowship Groups >
      • Presbyterian Women
    • GPPC Links
  • Calendar
  • Donate

When We Open Our Hands, God's Love Flows Through

9/28/2025

0 Comments

 
The concept of generosity as the antithesis of greed forms the theological foundation of a profound spiritual truth: generosity isn't just something God does—it's who God is. In a recent sermon exploring Luke's parable of Lazarus and the rich man alongside Paul's guidance in 1 Timothy, we discovered how this understanding transforms our approach to faith, community, and daily living.

The parable of Lazarus and the rich man presents a stark contrast between excessive wealth and abject poverty, between closed hands and unfulfilled need. What makes this parable particularly poignant is not merely the economic disparity but the spiritual blindness that accompanies it. The rich man, adorned in purple and fine linen, feasting sumptuously every day, fails to see Lazarus at his gate—covered with sores and longing for mere crumbs. This blindness persists even beyond death, as the rich man, now in torment, still views Lazarus as someone to serve his needs rather than a fellow human deserving dignity and care.

This spiritual blindness stands in direct opposition to the vision offered in 1 Timothy, which calls believers to "pursue righteousness, godliness, faith, love, endurance, and gentleness." These qualities aren't meant to be cultivated in isolation but developed within community—for faith exists in relationship, love requires connection, and endurance is something we develop together through difficult seasons. The epistle warns against the love of money as "a root of all kinds of evil," offering instead a path toward contentment and meaningful engagement with resources.

What does this mean for our daily lives? It suggests that experiencing God's generosity opens our eyes to see beyond ourselves. Like a beautiful spider web glistening with morning dew, God's generosity reveals itself in unexpected places—in nature's intricate design, in moments of simple connection with loved ones, in the laughter of a child, or in the communion of a faith community. When we recognize these gifts, we naturally respond with gratitude, turning toward the "gracious donor of our days" with hands and hearts opened in praise.

This recognition calls us to action. We're invited to "take hold of the life that really is life" by allowing our resources—our skills, time, and material possessions—to flow outward rather than remaining tightly grasped. The image of clenched fists versus open hands provides a powerful metaphor: we cannot simultaneously hold tight to our resources and remain open to God's movement through us. Every act of generosity, whether through formal charity or spontaneous kindness, creates ripples of hope and healing that extend far beyond our immediate circle.

The sacrament of baptism exemplifies this dynamic perfectly. In baptism, we celebrate grace undeserved yet graciously received and generously shared. We affirm that none of us walks alone but is surrounded by "such a great cloud of witnesses" and, more importantly, accompanied by God who has promised unconditional love. This sacrament reminds us that we are called to direct our "daily labor" toward communal flourishing rather than selfish gain.

The challenge before us is clear: to find concrete ways each day to stand in awe of God's generosity and to respond in kind. Whether through organized service projects, interpersonal care, or simply cultivating an attitude of wonder and gratitude, we're invited to open wide our hands in sharing. For in doing so, we not only reflect the divine nature but participate in it, becoming channels through which God's love flows into a world desperately in need of healing, teaching, and reclaiming.
0 Comments

The Evolution of Hebrew Scripture: From Oral Tradition to Written Text

9/28/2025

0 Comments

 
Presenter: GPPC Parish Associate Kit Schooley

The journey of Hebrew scripture from its earliest oral beginnings to the standardized written texts we know today spans thousands of years and represents one of the most fascinating stories in religious history. This evolution wasn't merely a change in format but reflected profound shifts in Jewish religious practice, community organization, and responses to historical crises.


Before writing became commonplace, Jewish religious traditions were entirely oral. For generations, stories, laws, and customs were transmitted through verbal repetition, with community members memorizing vast amounts of material. This oral tradition persisted for millennia, with knowledge passed down through families and communities without written documentation. Unlike the early Christian communities who quickly embraced writing to preserve their teachings, the ancient Israelites relied on memorization and verbal transmission, creating a system where religious knowledge was communal property rather than codified text.

A pivotal moment in this history came during King Josiah's reign around 604 BCE. According to the Book of Kings, during temple renovations, the high priest Hilkiah discovered a forgotten scroll containing "the book of the law" (what we now call Deuteronomy). When King Josiah heard its contents read aloud, he was so disturbed by how far the people had strayed from these teachings that "he tore his robes" in anguish. This dramatic rediscovery triggered significant religious reforms, including the reinstatement of Passover celebrations and the elimination of idolatrous practices. Whether this was a genuine rediscovery or a strategic political maneuver, as some scholars suggest, this moment marked a crucial shift toward recognizing the authority of written scripture in Jewish religious life.

The Babylonian exile beginning in 587 BCE further transformed Jewish scripture. When the temple was destroyed and the population displaced, the community could no longer center their religious practice around a physical sacred space. Upon their return from exile, leaders like Ezra and Nehemiah emphasized the importance of scripture, with Ezra regularly reading from the Torah in public gatherings. This period saw the second temple's construction and a growing emphasis on textual tradition alongside ritual practices.

By around 150 BCE, Jewish communities had spread throughout the Mediterranean world, creating new challenges for maintaining religious identity. In Alexandria, Egypt, which housed a substantial Jewish population, a significant translation project began. According to tradition, seventy-two elders (six from each tribe) separately translated the Hebrew scriptures into Greek, miraculously producing identical translations. This Greek translation, known as the Septuagint, varied considerably in its approach - some books were translated literally, while others were more interpretive adaptations for Greek-speaking Jews. This translation would later become a point of contention, as it was the version most early Christians, including Paul, used and quoted.

Hebrew itself presented unique challenges as a written language. Until around the 7th century CE, Hebrew was written using only consonants, without vowel markings. This meant that many written words could have multiple potential meanings depending on how they were vocalized. The Masoretes, Jewish scribes working between roughly 600-900 CE, developed a system of dots and dashes to indicate vowel sounds, creating what we now call the Masoretic Text. This standardization was partly a response to the spread of Christianity and its use of the sometimes-inaccurate Septuagint.

Perhaps the most transformative moment came with the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE. This catastrophe eliminated the central institution of Jewish worship and the priestly class that had administered it. In response, Judaism evolved from a temple-centered religion with sacrificial rituals led by priests to a text-centered faith guided by rabbis. Synagogues replaced the temple as community gathering places, and scripture became the binding force that helped maintain Jewish identity throughout the diaspora.

The rabbis who emerged as leaders preserved not only scripture but also created the Midrash - collections of interpretations and commentaries that captured the wisdom of outstanding teachers across generations. Unlike Christian tradition, which rarely preserved sermons from earlier eras, rabbinic Judaism created a vast library of interpretive texts that continue to influence religious thought today.

This evolution from oral tradition to written text, from temple worship to synagogue gathering, and from priestly leadership to rabbinic guidance represents one of history's most successful religious adaptations. In response to catastrophic loss and displacement, Judaism transformed itself by centering on portable, textual traditio
0 Comments

The Formation of the Biblical Canon: How Politics and Faith Shaped Scripture

9/28/2025

0 Comments

 
Presenter: GPPC Parish Associate Kit Schooley

The Bible we read today wasn't simply handed down from heaven—it emerged through centuries of human debate, politics, and spiritual discernment. The process reveals fascinating insights about early Christianity and raises profound questions about what was included and excluded from our sacred texts.


Matthew's genealogy of Jesus contains an unexpected element—four women with complicated backstories. Tamar, who disguised herself as a prostitute to continue Judah's lineage; Rahab, who sheltered Jewish spies; Ruth, a Moabite who refused to abandon her Jewish mother-in-law; and Bathsheba, whom King David took after arranging her husband's death. Each woman, despite challenging circumstances, played a crucial role in preserving Israel's future. Their inclusion in Jesus's lineage highlights how God works through unexpected people and circumstances—often women who operated outside conventional religious boundaries.

Luke makes another fascinating connection in his gospel by drawing parallels between Sarah (Abraham's wife), Elizabeth, and Mary. All three women experienced miraculous pregnancies that defied natural limitations—Sarah in her old age, Elizabeth also in her elder years, and Mary as a virgin. These connections weren't accidental but deliberately crafted to establish theological continuity between the Hebrew scriptures and the emerging Christian narrative.

The formation of the New Testament canon itself unfolded over centuries and wasn't definitively settled until around 400 CE. Early figures like Marcion proposed radical approaches—rejecting the entire Old Testament and accepting only portions of Luke's gospel and some of Paul's letters. Others, like Justin Martyr, advocated for three gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) while excluding John and Paul's letters. The debate continued with Tertullian, who accepted all four gospels but considered Matthew and John superior.

Constantine's conversion to Christianity marked a turning point. After a vision of a cross before battle led to victory, he embraced the faith and commissioned Bishop Eusebius to produce fifty copies of Christian scriptures for churches in Constantinople. However, Eusebius included only twenty of our current twenty-seven New Testament books, omitting Revelation, Hebrews, and certain other texts based on his personal preferences.

The final shape of the New Testament was largely determined by Athanasius, Bishop of Alexandria, who championed a collection of twenty-seven books around 367 CE. His selections gradually gained acceptance, though regional variations persisted for centuries. Different parts of the Roman Empire—Rome itself, Constantinople in the East, and Alexandria/Carthage in North Africa—maintained slightly different canons for generations.

What makes this history particularly relevant today is the discovery of additional early Christian texts at Nag Hammadi, Egypt in the mid-twentieth century. Works like the Gospel of Mary Magdalene, previously unknown to modern Christians, raise questions about what was excluded from our canon and why. These texts often feature perspectives and spiritual practices that didn't align with what became orthodox Christianity—including women's leadership, mystical experiences, and alternative understandings of Jesus's teachings.

The formation of the Bible involved human decisions influenced by political and theological considerations. Those who determined what would become scripture were concerned with apostolic authorship—whether a text was written by an apostle or someone close to one—and how widely accepted the text was among established Christian communities. But these decisions weren't made in a vacuum; they occurred during times of persecution, political upheaval, and theological controversy.

Understanding this history doesn't diminish the Bible's spiritual significance but enriches our appreciation of how God works through human processes. It invites us to engage more deeply with scripture, recognizing both its divine inspiration and its human context. Perhaps most importantly, it reminds us that Christianity has always contained diverse voices and perspectives—some preserved in our canon, others rediscovered centuries later, all contributing to our understanding of faith's rich tapestry.
0 Comments

Economic Justice Through Jesus's Eyes

9/28/2025

0 Comments

 
Jesus often challenges us with parables that make us uncomfortable, and the Parable of the Dishonest Manager in Luke 16:1-13 might be the most uncomfortable of them all. At first glance, it appears that Jesus is commending dishonesty, which seems completely contrary to his character and teachings. But as with many of Jesus's parables, the meaning becomes clearer when we understand the economic and social context of first-century Palestine under Roman occupation.

The economic reality of Jesus's time involved a severe power imbalance. The Roman Empire funded itself by heavily taxing its colonies, with farmers in rural areas like Galilee bearing the heaviest burden. Wealthy landowners from Jerusalem would offer to pay these taxes in exchange for taking ownership of the farmers' lands. These farmers then became tenants, forced to give a portion of their goods—with interest—to their new landlords. This created a pyramid structure with wealthy elites at the top, a small middle management class, and the vast majority of poor farmers at the bottom.

In this parable, Jesus describes a manager who was "squandering" his master's property. While we might initially think this means stealing or wasting resources, the context suggests another interpretation. What if the manager was simply not extracting enough wealth from the tenants to satisfy his master's greed? What one person at the top of the pyramid might call "squandering," those at the bottom might call "grace" or "mercy." This ambiguity seems intentional on Jesus's part, inviting us to question our assumptions about economic justice.

When the manager learns he's about to be fired, he makes a strategic decision. Realizing he's just as expendable in this exploitative system as the farmers beneath him, he decides to switch sides. He reduces the debts owed by the tenants, possibly by removing the interest that had accumulated—interest that was forbidden by Jewish law but commonly charged anyway. By doing so, he makes friends among those who had been oppressed by this system, ensuring they'll welcome him when he loses his position of power.

The real shock comes when Jesus says the master commended the manager for his shrewdness. This suggests that even the rich man recognized the clever way the manager had navigated a broken system. Jesus then drives his point home with the uncompromising statement: "You cannot serve both God and wealth." The message becomes clear—in an unjust economic system, followers of Jesus must decide where their ultimate loyalty lies.

This parable speaks powerfully to our contemporary context. Most of us occupy positions similar to the middle manager—somewhere in the middle of our economic pyramid. We can't instantly change the entire system as individuals, but we do have agency to use whatever influence we possess for good. Just as John the Baptist advised tax collectors and soldiers to use their positions ethically, Jesus challenges us to recognize our capacity to make a difference for those burdened by economic injustice.

The good news in this difficult text is threefold. First, we are not powerless to build a better way. Jesus knew that hopeless people don't challenge injustice, so he reminds us we have the capacity to link arms in solidarity and create communities where money serves relationships rather than relationships serving money. Second, opposing greed isn't a partisan act—both sides of our modern political spectrum participate in supporting unjust economic structures. Jesus's message transcends our contemporary political labels, calling all his followers to work toward liberation and justice. Finally, God has promised that oppressive economic pyramids will be upended—"the last will be first and the first will be last."

This parable doesn't condemn money or wealth itself, but rather confronts the greed that corrupts economic systems and human relationships. Jesus invites us to get on board with God's promise that greed will not have the final word. As followers of Christ, we are called to the joyful work of building more equitable communities where everyone has enough.
0 Comments

Listening Beyond the Grumbling: Finding Lost Coins in Divided Times

9/14/2025

0 Comments

 
In times of intense political division and violence, the teachings of Jesus offer a radical alternative to our instinct to retreat into tribal camps. The recent sermon at our church explored this theme through Jesus' parables of the lost sheep and the lost coin, providing timely wisdom for navigating our fractured society.

Jesus and his followers lived during a period of extreme political violence, not unlike our own time. The Jewish community of first-century Palestine was divided into competing factions: Pharisees with their strict Torah observance, Sadducees collaborating with Roman authorities, Zealots advocating violent resistance, and Essenes withdrawing from society altogether. This fragmentation mirrors our current political landscape, where Americans increasingly define themselves by opposition to others rather than by shared values.

The parables Jesus shares in Luke 15 offer a profound challenge to this divisive mentality. In the first parable, a shepherd leaves ninety-nine sheep to search for just one lost animal - a decision that defies conventional wisdom and economic sense. As the sermon pointed out, this might be called "the parable of the idiot shepherd" because it contradicts logical thinking. Similarly, the woman who loses one coin searches obsessively until she finds it, then throws a celebration that likely costs more than the coin itself. Both stories reveal a God who cares disproportionately about restoration and wholeness.

What's particularly striking about these parables is how they subvert the Vulcan proverb made famous by Mr. Spock: "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few." In God's economy, sometimes the one outweighs the ninety-nine. This radical prioritization of the lost challenges our tendency to sacrifice individuals for what we perceive as the greater good. It reminds us that every person matters infinitely to God, regardless of their political affiliation, social status, or moral standing.

The sermon highlighted two contrasting postures we can adopt in response to our divided world: grumbling or listening. The Pharisees and scribes in Luke's gospel grumbled about Jesus welcoming sinners, while tax collectors and sinners came near to listen. Grumbling manifests in our social media outrage, our finger-pointing without solution-offering, and our judgmental attitudes. Listening, on the other hand, requires empathy, gentleness, education, discernment, and reaching across divides.

A beautiful example of this listening posture came from a congregation member who discovered through a hymn-writing exercise that someone with opposing political views shared similar hopes and dreams for the world. This discovery led to a meaningful conversation across differences - precisely the kind of dialogue our fractured society desperately needs.

The sermon concluded with a profound theological truth: "God rejoices when a community is made whole." Our work as Christians isn't finished until all are found - both those we agree with and those we disagree with. This doesn't mean glossing over real differences or ignoring harmful ideologies. Rather, it means recognizing the image of God in every person and committing to the messy, difficult, beautiful work of community-building across divides.

As we face continued political violence and division, these ancient parables offer us an alternative path forward. They remind us that God's love is illogical, extravagant, and persistently searching for the lost. Our calling is to embody this same love - not by compromising our values, but by extending them to include even those we find difficult to love. In a world that profits from our division, listening to one another might be the most revolutionary act of all.
0 Comments

"Getting to 66" - How the Bible Was Compiled

9/14/2025

0 Comments

 
Presented by: Rev. Kit Schooley

The formation of the Christian Bible is a fascinating journey through history, theology, and human decision-making that spans centuries. Many Christians today might assume the Bible arrived as a complete, divinely-ordained package, but the reality is far more complex and human.


By around 100 CE, early Christian congregations faced numerous challenges in establishing what texts would guide their communities. Leaders had access to various resources: Old Testament literature, Jewish traditions, testimonies from those who had met disciples, Paul's letters, and emerging gospels that we now know as Matthew, Mark, and Luke. Each congregation likely had different combinations of these texts, creating natural diversity in early Christian communities.

The gospels themselves reveal a fascinating evolution of thought about Jesus's identity and mission. Mark, the earliest and shortest gospel, presents Jesus as enigmatic and mysterious. The "messianic secret" runs throughout Mark, with Jesus consistently avoiding directly claiming to be the Messiah. Everything happens "in a hurry" in Mark, with its abrupt ending at the empty tomb providing no resurrection appearances.

Matthew, written later, addresses concerns about Jesus's legitimacy by providing a birth narrative and genealogy connecting him to King David. Matthew resolves Mark's ambiguities about Jesus's identity, presenting him clearly as the promised Messiah. Interestingly, Matthew includes four women with scandalous sexual histories in Jesus's genealogy, creating a tension between royal legitimacy and human complexity.

Luke's gospel, written for a more cosmopolitan audience, places Jesus's birth in rural Bethlehem but traces his genealogy all the way back to Adam, emphasizing Jesus's connection to all humanity, not just Jewish lineage. Luke focuses on the present reality of God's kingdom rather than future predictions.

By the time John's gospel appears around 105 CE, the theology has evolved significantly. John begins with cosmic philosophy—"In the beginning was the Word"—and presents Jesus unambiguously as divine, one with God. This represents a dramatic theological development from Mark's mysterious figure to John's cosmic Christ.

As Christianity spread, competing interpretations emerged. Montanism emphasized new revelations beyond the gospels, including fasting, discouraging marriage, and valuing martyrdom. Arianism insisted that Jesus could not be fully divine because God is indivisible. Gnosticism taught secret knowledge that could help believers transcend their evil physical bodies. Marcion rejected the Hebrew Bible entirely, claiming Paul intended to turn believers toward a "higher, previously unknown God of love."

Church leaders like Ignatius of Antioch, Polycarp of Smyrna, and Barnabas of Rome faced difficult decisions about which texts to include in the developing canon. Should they choose gospels that didn't offend anyone? Create a single composite gospel? Exclude references to Judaism? Accept only texts written while disciples were still alive? Allow local congregations to have their own favorites?

These questions weren't resolved quickly or easily. The process of canonical formation continued for centuries, with Roman authorities eventually playing a decisive role around 315 CE. What we recognize today as the Bible is the product of theological development, political negotiation, and human judgment—a testament to both divine inspiration and the very human process of preserving and interpreting sacred tradition.
0 Comments

From Jesus to Christianity: The 66-Book Journey

9/7/2025

0 Comments

 
Speaker: Rev. Dr. Kit Schooley, GPPC Parish Associate

​The journey of how the Bible came to be—specifically how we arrived at the 66 books that make up our modern Bible—is a fascinating tale of history, politics, and faith that many Christians rarely explore in depth. The process was anything but orderly or divinely orchestrated in the way many might assume. As one Methodist preacher aptly put it, "You can get an A in Bible, but you can still flunk Christianity," highlighting the crucial distinction between understanding scripture academically and living out the faith it describes.


The formation of the Bible, particularly the New Testament, happened through what can only be described as a "wild and woolly" process that followed no clear pattern. None of the books in the New Testament, except possibly Revelation, were written with the intention of becoming scripture. In fact, not a single book was written within a generation of Jesus' lifetime. Jesus died around the year 30 CE, but the first gospel (Mark) wasn't discovered or used until around 70 CE—a full 40 years later. And even then, it wasn't considered "Bible" but rather a document written to comfort and guide a local congregation, likely in Rome, who had never known Jesus personally.

The timeline of early Christianity reveals how the disciples struggled to make sense of Jesus' death and the delay of his expected return. Around 35 CE, Stephen was stoned while Saul (later Paul) watched, holding the coats of those doing the stoning. By year 40, the disciples began evangelizing, with Philip choosing Samaria as his mission field. The church in Jerusalem selected James (Jesus's brother) and Peter as leaders, though Peter would soon leave to reach non-Jewish communities. Meanwhile, Paul, after his conversion, chose to focus on Greek-speaking communities far from Jerusalem.

A pivotal moment came in 70 CE when Romans sacked Jerusalem, destroying the temple and effectively eliminating the original church headquarters. This catastrophic event pushed Christianity further into the wider Hellenistic world, accelerating its transformation from a Jewish sect into something new. By this point, local congregations operated largely independently, with little unified leadership or doctrinal consistency. Each community functioned primarily on friendship and personal connections rather than formal structure.

The four gospels emerged gradually in response to these changing conditions. Mark came first around 70 CE, offering a straightforward account that began abruptly with Jesus' ministry and ended equally abruptly with his resurrection. Matthew followed around 90 CE, adding a birth narrative and more Jewish context. Luke emerged shortly after, emphasizing the Hellenistic world and Christianity's expansion beyond Jewish communities. Finally, John appeared around 95-100 CE, presenting a radically different portrait of Jesus as the divine Logos who descended from heaven.

Besides these canonical gospels, perhaps 50 or more other gospels circulated among early Christian communities. The Gospel of Mary, the Gospel of Judas, and many others were cherished by local congregations. Scholars believe Matthew and Luke drew from Mark and another lost source called "Q" (from the German "Quelle" meaning "source"), which contained sayings and stories about Jesus.

As Christianity expanded, organizational challenges emerged. How could you unify congregations stretching from North Africa to France in an era without rapid communication? Various writings appeared to address practical matters of church governance—the Didache being one example—establishing roles like deacons, elders, and priests. Heresies also developed, particularly around questions of Jesus' nature (human or divine) and the problem of reconciling his divinity with his humanity.

Perhaps the most persistent challenge came from Gnosticism, which proposed that salvation came through secret knowledge available only to initiates. Gnostics believed in two worlds—heaven (perfect and spiritual) and earth (fallen and material)—and struggled to explain how a divine Jesus could have inhabited a physical body. Their solution was to suggest that humans contained a divine "spark" that Jesus came to awaken.

This complex, messy process of canon formation continued for centuries, driven by politics, personalities, and practical concerns as much as by theological reflection. Understanding this history doesn't diminish the Bible's significance, but it does invite us to approach it with greater humility and awareness of its human elements alongside its divine inspiration.
0 Comments

The Cost of Discipleship: What Jesus Really Meant in Luke 14

9/7/2025

0 Comments

 
Preacher: Rev. Dr. Stephen M. Fearing

Text: Luke 14:25-33

When Jesus tells his followers they must "hate" their families to follow him, it creates immediate discomfort for modern readers. This passage from Luke 14:25-33 isn't found on inspirational pillows or coffee mugs for good reason. It challenges our comfortable assumptions about what it means to follow Christ, and presents a vision of discipleship that's far more demanding than many contemporary versions of Christianity.


Understanding this difficult text requires looking beyond a surface reading. Jesus wasn't literally commanding hatred toward family members—such an interpretation would contradict virtually everything else he taught about love and compassion. The Greek word "miseo" translated as "hate" can also mean "to love less" or "to have relative disregard for." Jesus was using powerful hyperbole, a rhetorical technique he employed frequently to drive home crucial points about the kingdom of God. Just as he spoke of camels passing through needles' eyes or plucking out offensive eyeballs, Jesus utilized exaggeration to emphasize profound spiritual truths.

The central message is unmistakable: following Jesus isn't something to be taken lightly. Christianity isn't a hobby, an identity marker, or a weekend activity. It demands absolute priority in a disciple's life. Jesus illustrates this with two parables—a person calculating whether they have resources to complete a tower, and a king determining if his army can defeat a larger force. Both stories emphasize the importance of counting the cost before committing. Discipleship requires preparation, sacrifice, and a clear-eyed assessment of what following Jesus will demand.

Modern American Christianity often presents faith as complementary to our existing values and priorities. It becomes a spiritual endorsement of the status quo rather than a radical reorientation of our lives. Jesus challenges this comfortable arrangement. He describes a way of living that runs counter to cultural norms, political ideologies, and economic systems that prioritize individual convenience, wealth accumulation, and power. The path of discipleship is fundamentally countercultural—swimming against powerful currents rather than floating along the path of least resistance.

What might this discipleship look like in practice? Our congregation recently completed a summer shelter project, hosting about a dozen women experiencing homelessness for ninety days. This required sacrifices—giving up space, time, resources, and control. Volunteers had to step outside their comfort zones and routines. Yet through this work, meaningful connections formed across significant differences. Lives were changed—not just for those receiving shelter, but for those providing it. This embodies the paradox Jesus describes: discipleship is demanding yet liberating, costly yet fulfilling.

The TV series "The Chosen" depicts Jesus giving a remarkably honest "recruitment speech" to a potential disciple: "You'll be adored, hated, needed, lost and found. You will lose friends...and you might even lose your own life...People will say you're a fool, that I was a fool, that it was all a lie." This isn't a marketing campaign designed to maximize followers. It's a truthful description of what following Jesus entails—losing some things to gain something greater, saying "yes" to God's call even when the world says "no."

True discipleship transforms how we define family, success, justice, and power. It challenges us to surrender possessions, carry crosses, and reorient our priorities. Yet this very reorientation opens us to new possibilities for community, purpose, and meaning. When we follow Jesus into the messiness of loving our neighbors, we discover the liberating power of living for something beyond ourselves. Discipleship isn't easy, but it offers rewards that our consumer culture cannot provide—the joy of creating justice and embodying love in a world desperately in need of both.
0 Comments

The Beautiful Sadness: Finding Hope in Grief

9/1/2025

0 Comments

 
Preacher: Dylan Lewellyn
Texts: Lamentations 3 & John 14:1-7

In a world that often encourages us to suppress our negative emotions, particularly grief, Sunday's sermon provided a powerful counternarrative rooted in biblical wisdom. The message centered on the profound truth that grief isn't something to overcome or escape—it's an essential part of our human experience that requires acknowledgment, expression, and community.


The sermon began with a poignant disclaimer: grief is heavy, experienced differently by each person, and this sanctuary serves as a safe space to feel the entire spectrum of human emotions. This acknowledgment set the tone for a message that would challenge our cultural tendency to rush past pain or hide our sorrow. Drawing from the rarely-discussed book of Lamentations, the sermon invited us to reconsider how we process loss in its many forms—not just the death of loved ones, but also the loss of relationships, physical abilities, belongings, jobs, and anticipated futures. Each of these losses deserves to be grieved.

Perhaps most striking was the sermon's bold assertion that expressing anger toward God in our grief is not only permissible but modeled in scripture itself. Lamentations 3 portrays a writer who directly accuses God of causing suffering, using visceral imagery of broken bones, darkness, and imprisonment. This raw honesty reflects how grief can feel like God has turned against us personally, walling us in with no escape. Yet the sermon emphasized that our God is greater than our anger and can handle our most honest lamentations. This permission to express our full range of emotions toward God stands in stark contrast to religious teachings that sometimes discourage questioning or expressing negative feelings toward the divine.

The literary turning point in Lamentations 3—marked by "But this I call to mind and therefore I have hope"—demonstrates how biblical lament typically includes a reframing of the narrative. The sermon highlighted this pattern: genuine expressions of despair followed by renewed hope in God's steadfast love. This structure provides us with language for our own grief journeys, helping us articulate feelings that trauma often makes difficult to express. For Christians, Jesus becomes the ultimate "yet" in our stories of suffering, the way through our darkest valleys.

The sermon challenged popular misconceptions about grief, particularly the notion that grief progresses linearly through five neat stages ending in permanent acceptance. Instead, grief was described as circular, returning in waves throughout our lives. Examples from the preacher's personal experience and the experiences of others illustrated how grief can resurface years or even decades later—triggered by a Conway Twitty song or a conversation about a long-deceased spouse. Rather than viewing this as failure to "move on," the sermon reframed it as evidence of love's enduring power, describing grief as a "beautiful sadness" that connects us to our humanity and to the joy that preceded our loss.
0 Comments

    Rev. Dr. Stephen M. Fearing

    Rev. Dr. Stephen M. Fearing is the Head of Staff of Guilford Park Presbyterian Church.

    Archives

    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture