God’s Holy “And Yet”
The book of 2 Kings does not end with a triumph. It ends with a burned temple, a broken city, and a people carried off into exile — and then, almost as an afterthought, four quiet verses about a middle-aged man being let out of prison. It is not a happy ending. But it is something, and on some Sundays something is exactly what we need.
When the Little Systems Crumble
This week I came across a hymn I had never heard before: “Strong Son of God, Immortal Love,” number 228 in the 1955 hymnal, with words written by Alfred, Lord Tennyson in 1850. The third verse has stayed with me all week:
Our little systems have their day;
they have their day and cease to be;
they are but broken lights of thee,
and thou, O Lord, art more than they.
I have had a lot of pastoral conversations over the past several years, and they sound remarkably alike. People sit down across from me and describe the same thing: the feeling of a fire hose to the face. The sense that the institutions and ideologies and arrangements we have relied on are wobbling all at once. Tennyson had a phrase for it before any of us did. Our little systems have their day.
That is not so far from what the exiles knew. When Nebuchadnezzar's army broke the walls of Jerusalem and burned the house of the Lord, it was not just a military defeat. It was the collapse of everything that had told God's people who they were — the single most traumatic event in the biblical story of Israel.
Four Ways We Cope
Walter Brueggemann names four things we tend to reach for when the world seems to be going to hell in a handbasket. He calls them false responses to crisis. Before I list them, let me say clearly: none of these is shameful, and all of us have used all four. They are natural. They are simply not strategies for building anything better.
The first is denial — what Brueggemann calls the royal embrace, the refusal to admit that the current system is failing, unjust, or ending. Heads in the sand. We have all done it.
The second is nostalgia, the manufactured past: the aggressive over-remembering of a golden age that probably never existed. Nostalgia is a potent drug. Brueggemann wrote those words twenty-six years ago, which I think is worth sitting with.
The third is despair, the loss of agency — the paralyzing assumption that because the old way is dead, no new future is possible. Despair is fine to feel. We just cannot set up camp there, because despair strips us of any ability to build.
And the fourth, ironically, is optimism: the superficial fix, the fantasy that things will improve on their own. Which brings us to the most important distinction of the day.
Hope Is Not Optimism
Optimism is the belief that things will get better. Hope is something else entirely — an orientation of the spirit that does not depend on the outcome or on the odds. Optimism waits. Hope works.
A Pension, Not a Mansion
Which brings us to Jehoiachin, the last character we meet in 2 Kings. He was a young king — grandson of Josiah — when the captivity began. Thirty-seven years later, a new ruler comes to power in Babylon and releases him from prison. He takes off his prison clothes, he is given a seat at the king's table, and he receives a daily allowance for the rest of his life.
That is the ending. And it is remarkable precisely because of what it is not.
It is not denial, because the text tells us plainly that thirty-seven years have already passed. It is not nostalgia, because nobody goes back to Jerusalem. It is not despair, because there is this stubborn little “and yet” at the end. And it is not optimism, because he is given a pension, not a mansion. Those are two very different things.
Incidentally, this is not only a story. In the early 1900s, archaeologists excavating in Babylon found a clay ledger recording, in specific terms, the rations given to an exiled Judean king named Jehoiachin. The receipt survived.
An Active Choice and a Choice to Be Active
I have been reading David LaMotte's book You Are Changing the World Whether You Like It or Not in preparation for his visit with us in a few weeks. He puts it this way:
Hope is the conscious decision to live toward the world you would like to see, but to take action to move closer to a better way, regardless of your chances of achieving your goal. … Hope, it seems to me, is both an active choice and a choice to be active.
So here is my invitation. Take stock this week of how you tend to react when things fall apart — and then take one tangible step toward building something better. Put together care packages for our neighbors at the Pride Festival. Volunteer with A Simple Gesture, which needs three more drivers for the Green Bag program on September 12. Something small and real.
Sometimes God's “and yet” is all we have when we come to worship. Some weeks that is enough to sing about. Our little systems have their day, and they cease to be — they are but broken lights of thee, and thou, O Lord, art more than they.
Questions for Reflection
- Of Brueggemann's four responses — denial, nostalgia, despair, optimism — which one do you reach for first when things feel like they are crumbling? What does it protect you from?
- Where in your own life have you experienced a “pension, not a mansion” kind of grace — something real and sustaining, but not the restoration you were hoping for?
- What would it change for you to practice hope as an action rather than as a feeling about the future?
- Is there a “golden age” you find yourself remembering more fondly than it deserves? What might that longing actually be asking for?
- What is one tangible step you could take this week toward the world you would like to see — regardless of whether you will live to see it?
RSS Feed