Guilford Park Presbyterian Church
2100 FERNWOOD DRIVE
​GREENSBORO, NC 27408
CHURCH: 336-288-5452
PRESCHOOL 336-282-6697


  • Home
  • Plan Your Visit
  • ABOUT US
    • Our Story
    • What We Believe
    • Leadership >
      • Staff
      • Session
      • Presbyterian Women
      • Committee Leadership
    • Our Affiliations
  • Worship & Music
    • Sermons
    • Blog
    • Live Stream
  • Ministries
  • Preschool
  • GIVE
  • Associate Pastor Search
  • David LaMotte Info & RSVP

"God's Holy 'And Yet'"

8/31/2026

0 Comments

 
Click to set custom HTML

God’s Holy “And Yet”

2 Kings 25:8–12, 27–30

August 30, 2026 · 14th Sunday after Pentecost

This blog post was generated by AI based on the sermon manuscript and reviewed by Rev. Dr. Stephen M. Fearing. It is not the sermon manuscript itself and may differ from what was preached.

The book of 2 Kings does not end with a triumph. It ends with a burned temple, a broken city, and a people carried off into exile — and then, almost as an afterthought, four quiet verses about a middle-aged man being let out of prison. It is not a happy ending. But it is something, and on some Sundays something is exactly what we need.

When the Little Systems Crumble

This week I came across a hymn I had never heard before: “Strong Son of God, Immortal Love,” number 228 in the 1955 hymnal, with words written by Alfred, Lord Tennyson in 1850. The third verse has stayed with me all week:

Our little systems have their day;
they have their day and cease to be;
they are but broken lights of thee,
and thou, O Lord, art more than they.

I have had a lot of pastoral conversations over the past several years, and they sound remarkably alike. People sit down across from me and describe the same thing: the feeling of a fire hose to the face. The sense that the institutions and ideologies and arrangements we have relied on are wobbling all at once. Tennyson had a phrase for it before any of us did. Our little systems have their day.

That is not so far from what the exiles knew. When Nebuchadnezzar's army broke the walls of Jerusalem and burned the house of the Lord, it was not just a military defeat. It was the collapse of everything that had told God's people who they were — the single most traumatic event in the biblical story of Israel.

Four Ways We Cope

Walter Brueggemann names four things we tend to reach for when the world seems to be going to hell in a handbasket. He calls them false responses to crisis. Before I list them, let me say clearly: none of these is shameful, and all of us have used all four. They are natural. They are simply not strategies for building anything better.

The first is denial — what Brueggemann calls the royal embrace, the refusal to admit that the current system is failing, unjust, or ending. Heads in the sand. We have all done it.

The second is nostalgia, the manufactured past: the aggressive over-remembering of a golden age that probably never existed. Nostalgia is a potent drug. Brueggemann wrote those words twenty-six years ago, which I think is worth sitting with.

The third is despair, the loss of agency — the paralyzing assumption that because the old way is dead, no new future is possible. Despair is fine to feel. We just cannot set up camp there, because despair strips us of any ability to build.

And the fourth, ironically, is optimism: the superficial fix, the fantasy that things will improve on their own. Which brings us to the most important distinction of the day.

Hope Is Not Optimism

Optimism is the belief that things will get better. Hope is something else entirely — an orientation of the spirit that does not depend on the outcome or on the odds. Optimism waits. Hope works.

A Pension, Not a Mansion

Which brings us to Jehoiachin, the last character we meet in 2 Kings. He was a young king — grandson of Josiah — when the captivity began. Thirty-seven years later, a new ruler comes to power in Babylon and releases him from prison. He takes off his prison clothes, he is given a seat at the king's table, and he receives a daily allowance for the rest of his life.

That is the ending. And it is remarkable precisely because of what it is not.

It is not denial, because the text tells us plainly that thirty-seven years have already passed. It is not nostalgia, because nobody goes back to Jerusalem. It is not despair, because there is this stubborn little “and yet” at the end. And it is not optimism, because he is given a pension, not a mansion. Those are two very different things.

Incidentally, this is not only a story. In the early 1900s, archaeologists excavating in Babylon found a clay ledger recording, in specific terms, the rations given to an exiled Judean king named Jehoiachin. The receipt survived.

An Active Choice and a Choice to Be Active

I have been reading David LaMotte's book You Are Changing the World Whether You Like It or Not in preparation for his visit with us in a few weeks. He puts it this way:

Hope is the conscious decision to live toward the world you would like to see, but to take action to move closer to a better way, regardless of your chances of achieving your goal. … Hope, it seems to me, is both an active choice and a choice to be active.

So here is my invitation. Take stock this week of how you tend to react when things fall apart — and then take one tangible step toward building something better. Put together care packages for our neighbors at the Pride Festival. Volunteer with A Simple Gesture, which needs three more drivers for the Green Bag program on September 12. Something small and real.

Sometimes God's “and yet” is all we have when we come to worship. Some weeks that is enough to sing about. Our little systems have their day, and they cease to be — they are but broken lights of thee, and thou, O Lord, art more than they.

Questions for Reflection

  1. Of Brueggemann's four responses — denial, nostalgia, despair, optimism — which one do you reach for first when things feel like they are crumbling? What does it protect you from?
  2. Where in your own life have you experienced a “pension, not a mansion” kind of grace — something real and sustaining, but not the restoration you were hoping for?
  3. What would it change for you to practice hope as an action rather than as a feeling about the future?
  4. Is there a “golden age” you find yourself remembering more fondly than it deserves? What might that longing actually be asking for?
  5. What is one tangible step you could take this week toward the world you would like to see — regardless of whether you will live to see it?
0 Comments

"Lost and Found"

8/23/2026

0 Comments

 

Dust on the Scroll: What Josiah Can (and Can't) Teach Us About Change

2 Kings 22:1–13; 23:1–4, 24–27
13th Sunday after Pentecost — August 23, 2026
This blog post was generated by AI based on the sermon manuscript and reviewed by Rev. Dr. Stephen M. Fearing. It is not the sermon manuscript itself and may differ from what was preached.

What happens when a whole community forgets why it exists — and then, quite by accident, rediscovers it under a layer of dust? That's the question at the heart of King Josiah's story, and it's a question worth sitting with as we near the end of our long journey through 1 and 2 Kings. This week we leave the fallen northern kingdom of Israel behind and turn south, to Judah, where a boy-king and a forgotten scroll set the stage for one of the more surprising reflections in this whole series: that the heroes we love to celebrate aren't usually the ones who change the world.

A King Worth Rooting For

Josiah began his reign at eight years old — a detail that tends to raise eyebrows, given how badly young rulers usually fare in stories both ancient and modern. But Josiah is different. Of every king chronicled across 1 and 2 Samuel and 1 and 2 Kings, he is the only one who receives an unqualified, glowing review. Every other ruler in this long royal history has ups and downs, often more downs than ups. Josiah alone turns to the Lord with his whole heart, soul, and might.

The turning point comes almost by accident. During routine repairs to the temple, a priest stumbles across something that had been lost — the Book of the Covenant, the Torah itself, sitting forgotten and dust-covered in a closet. The very document that explained why the temple existed in the first place had been buried under the temple's own maintenance.

Forgetting Why We Exist

There's something both ironic and heartbreaking in that image. Institutions — including churches — have a way of losing track of their founding purpose. We're not called to maintain buildings or fill committees, important as that work sometimes is. We're called to do justice, love kindness, and walk humbly. That's the core of it, and it's easy to bury under the ordinary business of keeping an institution running.

We must never, ever, ever allow ourselves to forget that's why we exist.

Rather than responding defensively when the scroll was found, Josiah did something remarkable: he gathered the whole community together, read the law aloud, and invited everyone to recommit themselves to it. The people wept. They renewed their covenant. The idols came down. It's a genuine moment of collective repentance and renewal — and it's worth naming as such.

Doing Right Even When It Doesn't Change the Outcome

But Josiah's story carries a harder truth too. He had already heard the prophecy that Judah would fall regardless of what he did. Next week's text will bear that out — the fall to Babylon comes anyway. And still, Josiah leads the people in recommitting to God's law. That's a striking picture of leadership: doing the right thing not because it guarantees a happy ending, but because it's right.

The Trouble with Hero Stories

This is where the sermon turns toward a theme close to home this season, as Guilford Park prepares to welcome David LaMotte for the Ruth Lamb weekend next month. In his book You Are Changing the World Whether You Like It or Not, LaMotte pushes back hard against what he calls the hero narrative — the cultural myth that social change happens when the right individual shows up to save the day, Hollywood-style.

History tells a different story. Take Rosa Parks. Most of us learned a shorthand version: a tired woman refuses to give up her bus seat, and a movement is born. What often gets left out is that Parks had already spent more than a decade organizing nonviolently before that day, and that after her arrest she went right back to the unglamorous work of sustaining the Montgomery bus boycott for over a year. The moment mattered. But it was the ongoing, collective labor — the committees, the carpools, the meetings — that actually carried the movement.

It's not heroes that make change, but movements that make change, and committees that keep those movements going.

We Are All Part of the Committee

Josiah's individual faithfulness matters — leadership genuinely matters. But the deeper temptation this text exposes is our habit of waiting for someone else to save us: the next president, the next pastor, the right CEO. LaMotte's insight, paired with Josiah's story, points somewhere else entirely — toward the shared, ongoing responsibility we all carry for one another. We are all part of the movement. We are all part of the committee called Guilford Park Presbyterian Church, called together since 1948 to love our neighbors, one unglamorous, faithful act at a time.

Questions for Reflection

  1. What might be "buried under the dust" in your own life or community right now — a purpose or calling you've quietly lost track of?
  2. Josiah did the right thing even knowing it wouldn't change the ultimate outcome. Where in your own life might faithfulness matter more than results?
  3. Where have you caught yourself waiting for a "hero" to fix a problem instead of joining the slow, collective work of change?
  4. Who are the "Rosa Parkses" in your own life — people whose quiet, long-term organizing rarely gets the credit the single dramatic moment does?
  5. What would it look like for you to see yourself not as a hero-in-waiting, but as part of a committee — a community carrying shared responsibility for the work ahead?
0 Comments

"How a Kingdom Forgets & How a Church Remembers"

8/17/2026

0 Comments

 

How a Kingdom Forgets

2 Kings 17:1–23

12th Sunday after Pentecost · August 16, 2026

This blog post was generated by AI based on the sermon manuscript and reviewed by Rev. Dr. Stephen M. Fearing. It is not the sermon manuscript itself and may differ from what was preached.

Have you ever looked back and tried to pinpoint the exact moment everything fell apart? This week's Scripture brings us to that moment for the nation of Israel — a long, harsh passage with little grace in it, describing the fall of the northern kingdom to Assyria in 722 BCE. It's the low point of the whole journey through 1st and 2nd Kings, and it invites us to sit with a hard question: how does a kingdom forget who it belongs to?

A Story That Began with a Choice

To understand this low point, it helps to remember how the story began. Long before Assyria, back in the days of Joshua and Judges, the Israelites came to God wanting a king like the nations around them. God resisted — more than once — but the people insisted, and God relented. That's how the story of Saul, David, and Solomon began, with real high points and real low points along the way.

After Solomon grew preoccupied with national glory and his own reputation, and less concerned with whether his people were fed and housed, the kingdom split into Judah in the south and Israel in the north. What follows is a long, hard-to-track succession of kings, many of whom ruled only a few years — a chaos that may be exactly the point the author of 2 Kings wants us to feel. There was no political stability, and things kept getting worse. Meanwhile, Assyria pressed in, and Israel's tribute payments could only delay the inevitable. Samaria fell after a three-year siege, and Israel was exiled.

Not One Bad Day, But Hundreds of Years

The theological indictment in this chapter is long and unflinching, but its heart is simple: Israel fell because of unfaithfulness to God. And crucially, this wasn't a sudden collapse.

This was not a sudden occurrence. Over hundreds of years, God sent prophets to remind Israel that they belonged to the God who calls them to neighborliness.

There was no single monumental mistake. Instead, there were years and years and years in which the people forgot whose they were — forgot they belonged to each other, and forgot that the measure of a kingdom is not its national glory but how it treats its most vulnerable.

Sitting in the Discomfort

It would be easier to end this sermon with a hopeful word, but that grace isn't in today's passage. There is grace coming — a silver lining will emerge in the final two weeks of this series through 2 Kings — but for now, the invitation is simply to sit in the discomfort.

And yet there is something steadying in this hard truth: if calamity came after hundreds of years of missed opportunities to course-correct, then the reverse is also true. Slow, faithful practices can shape us just as powerfully in the other direction. Our worship, the way we order our life together week after week, month after month, year after year, is a long-term practice of spiritual formation — meant to remind us again and again of who we are and whose we are.

How a Church Remembers

Things didn't go wrong for Israel because of one bad Sunday, and they can't be turned around by one good Sunday either. But gathering together, week after week, is itself the practice that keeps us tethered to what matters: doing justice, loving kindness, and walking humbly with God.

Even something as ordinary as passing the peace carries this weight. It's not always a favorite moment for the introverts among us, but sharing Christ's peace across our divisions and differences, week after week, forms us over years and decades in ways we might not notice day to day. That same impulse showed up unexpectedly at a recent Chicago White Sox game, where 45,000 fans passed the peace together during a "Pope Night" celebration honoring Chicago-native Pope Leo — a reminder that this practice of reaching across the aisle to a stranger is bigger than any one sanctuary.

The songs we sing, the confessions we make admitting how we've fallen short, the benediction response reminding us that faith is a marathon and not a sprint — all of it is formation. We come back, week after week, not because we've mastered faithfulness, but because we haven't, and because remembering takes practice.

If today's sermon is titled "How a Kingdom Forgets," perhaps what happens when we gather for worship each week could just as well be called "How a Church Remembers."

Questions for Reflection

  • Where in your own life have you noticed unfaithfulness creep in gradually, over years, rather than through one dramatic moment?
  • What practices — in worship or in daily life — have helped you remember who you are and whose you are over the long term?
  • How does your community measure its own faithfulness: by glory and reputation, or by how it treats its most vulnerable members?
  • What would it look like for you to sit in discomfort this week, rather than rushing toward a resolution or a hopeful word?
  • What ordinary, repeated practice in your life might be quietly forming you — for better or worse — without your fully realizing it?
0 Comments

Turning Battlefields Into Banquets

8/9/2026

0 Comments

 

Battlefields Into Banquets

2 Kings 6:8–23

11th Sunday after Pentecost (Year A) — August 9, 2026

This blog post was generated by AI based on the sermon manuscript and reviewed by Rev. Dr. Stephen M. Fearing. It is not the sermon manuscript itself and may differ from what was preached.

What do you do when your enemy walks straight into your hands? In this week's passage from 2 Kings, the king of Israel assumes the answer is obvious. But the prophet Elisha has a different, far stranger idea — one that asks us to imagine a world where battlefields become banquets instead.

An Annoyed King and a Frustrated Chess Player

The story opens with the king of Aram growing increasingly paranoid. Every time he tells his officers his battle plans, the Israelites somehow already know. Once, it could be coincidence. Twice, bad luck. But after this happens again and again, he's convinced there's a spy in his ranks. His officers finally confess the truth: it isn't a spy at all. It's Elisha, the prophet, who somehow knows what the king says even in the privacy of his own bedchamber.

It's the kind of frustration that might feel oddly familiar to anyone who's played a game against an opponent who seems to know your moves before you make them. There's something deeply human about that particular flavor of exasperation — the sense that someone else can always see one step ahead. For the king of Aram, that frustration curdles quickly into a plan for violence: find Elisha, and eliminate him.

Surrounded, and Not Alone

The king sends his army to Dothan, where Elisha is staying, and surrounds the city in the dead of night. When Elisha's servant wakes early the next morning and steps outside, he's met with the sight of an entire army encircling them. Understandably, he panics. But Elisha's response is remarkably calm: "Do not be afraid, for there are more with us than there are with them."

It's only when Elisha prays that his servant's eyes might be opened that the young man sees what Elisha already knows — the surrounding hills are full of horses and chariots of fire, a heavenly army present all along, unseen. It's a vivid reminder that what looks like an impossible threat may not tell the whole story. There is more going on, more support and presence, than what first meets the eye.

"Do not be afraid, for there are more with us than there are with them."

From Capture to Feast

What follows is one of the more startling turns in scripture. Elisha strikes the Aramean army with a temporary blindness, then leads them — disoriented and helpless — straight into the heart of Samaria, the Israelite capital. When the king of Israel realizes his enemy has walked directly into his hands, his instinct is immediate: strike them down. It's the response that makes sense in a moment of war, when victory is finally within reach.

But Elisha refuses. These aren't the king's captives to kill, he insists — they're his, and he doesn't want a slaughter. He wants a meal. Sight is restored to the Aramean soldiers, and instead of facing swords, they find a banquet spread before them. After they eat and drink their fill, they're sent home, unharmed. And, as the text tells us, the raids stop. The violence that once defined the relationship between these two nations comes, at least for a time, to an end.

Feeding Instead of Fighting

It's worth naming how countercultural this story feels, even now. We live in a moment shaped by the instinct to fight back, to meet aggression with aggression, to see conflict as something that only ends through domination. Elisha's choice to feed his enemies rather than destroy them isn't naive — it's a deliberate act of moral imagination, an insistence that another way is possible even when it isn't the expected one.

This isn't a critique of the people who serve in the military, or of the very real sacrifices that service requires. It's possible to hold real gratitude for those who serve while still longing, and praying, for a world where war itself becomes less necessary. Harry Emerson Fosdick, the founding preacher of Riverside Church, modeled that same balance — a committed pacifist who nonetheless took time each week to personally thank servicemen and women worshiping in his pews. It's fitting that Fosdick's own hymn, "God of Grace and God of Glory," carries the line, "Cure thy children's warring madness." That prayer feels every bit as urgent today.

Expanding Our Moral Imagination

Every character in this story — the servant, the king of Aram, the king of Israel — assumes that warfare is the only option available. It takes a prophet, and the God who sent him, to imagine something different: a battlefield transformed into a banquet table. We may not carry the burdens of a president or a military commander, and we don't have to pretend we do. But we are stewards of a story like this one, a story that refuses to let violence have the final word, and that invites us to imagine, together, what feeding our enemies might look like in our own time.

Questions for Reflection

  • When have you assumed a conflict could only end one way — and been surprised by another possibility?
  • Elisha's servant needed his eyes opened to see the fuller picture around him. Where in your own life might you need that same kind of vision?
  • What would it look like, practically, to "feed" rather than "fight" an adversary in your own relationships, community, or nation?
  • How do you hold together gratitude for those who serve in the military with a longing for a world that needs war less?
  • What might it take for you — or your community — to imagine the battlefield as a banquet?
0 Comments

"There Was a Girl..."

8/2/2026

0 Comments

 

There Is Always a Girl

2 Kings 5:1-4, 9-14

August 2, 2026

This blog post was generated by AI based on the sermon manuscript and reviewed by Rev. Dr. Stephen M. Fearing. It is not the sermon manuscript itself and may differ from what was preached.

Every year, Naaman gets the headline. He's the "great man," the "mighty warrior," the commander whose name means "pleasant" even as his armies leave devastation in their wake. But tucked inside his story is someone the text never bothers to name: a girl, stolen from her home, who says one line and then disappears from the page. What happens when we let our attention rest on her instead?

The Man with the Pleasant Name

Naaman arrives in 2 Kings 5 with every credential that matters in his world. He is a commander in the army of Aram, Israel's neighbor and rival. He is called a "mighty warrior," a "great man," someone held in "high favor." He has, by every worldly measure, won.

But womanist scholar Dr. Wilda Gafney pushes back on that word "victory." Victory, she reminds us, is the language of the conqueror — never the conquered. What Naaman's people call victory, the people of Israel experienced as slaughter. Buried in that difference is an unnamed girl, taken captive in one of Naaman's raids and forced into service in his household.

The Girl the Text Won't Name

We don't know her name. Scripture doesn't think her significant enough to record it. She is a slave girl, torn from her family, made to serve the wife of the very man responsible for her captivity. And yet the whole story turns on her.

Rev. Dr. Jacqui Lewis has said it simply: there is always a girl. Dr. Gafney puts flesh on that claim, describing generation after generation of girls edited out of genealogies, erased from their own household stories, denied the dignity of a name — and still, somehow, present. As she writes:

On the page, between the lines, behind the story; there is always a girl.

In this story, she is a caged bird singing of a God whose power moves through a prophet named Elisha. And notice the quiet irony: the fierce warrior, the man with victories to his name, is utterly powerless to heal himself. He depends entirely on the wisdom of the girl he claims as property.

A Survival Tactic, Not Just a Kindness

The girl speaks exactly one line in this whole account: "If only my lord were with the prophet who is in Samaria! He would cure him of his skin disease." It's almost casual — the kind of comment designed to plant hope without demanding anything. She knows something her master cannot win in battle or negotiate at court, and she makes herself useful.

That usefulness isn't simply a virtue to admire; it's a survival strategy. Making oneself indispensable is a way the powerless reclaim agency inside a system built to deny them any. It's the same instinct that drove Esther to work the king's court, Rahab to bargain for her household's safety, and Shiprah and Puah to quietly defy Pharaoh's murderous decree. This unnamed girl stands in good company — women who understood how to use whatever leverage patriarchy allowed them in order to protect the vulnerable.

Why the Margins Matter

As a father of two young girls, this story matters to me in a particular way. I want them — and every girl like them — to know that their stories matter, their agency matters, their bodies and safety and dignity matter. This girl's name may be lost to history, but it was never lost to the God who parted the Jordan's waters for Naaman's healing.

Because there are girls listening — in our churches, our homes, our schools, our workplaces — to how the men around them talk about them. They deserve better than being treated as a plot device that exists only to point our attention toward someone else's story. And if we're willing to do the work of lifting back the text's layers, we find more of God's fingerprints in the margins: just a few verses later, it's Naaman's own servants — quite possibly women or girls themselves — who talk him down from his wounded pride and convince him to do exactly what the prophet said.

What the Healing Actually Cost

Naaman arrives at Elisha's house expecting ceremony and instead receives a curt instruction: go wash in the Jordan seven times. His ego is bruised — he wanted the prophet himself, the wave of a hand, the drama befitting his rank. Instead he's handed the muddy, unremarkable river he'd already called inferior to the waters back home.

Six times, nothing happens. By the seventh dip, soaked and humbled in front of the servants who talked him into it, something gives way. The real miracle in this story may not be the cleansing itself, but what it cost Naaman to get there: he had to let a slave girl, and his own servants, be right — and let himself be wrong — in front of everyone.

Let us give thanks, then, for the unnamed women and girls of this text. Let us give thanks for a God whose power moved not through the mighty warrior at the center of the story, but through those he only ever valued for how well they served him. And let us give thanks for a Christ whose Spirit keeps drawing our eyes toward the margins of scripture — where we are far more likely to find God than in the centers of power we build for ourselves.


Questions for Reflection

  • Who are the "unnamed" people in your own life whose wisdom or courage made a difference, but whose names rarely get mentioned when the story is told?
  • Where have you seen "making yourself useful" function as a survival strategy for someone with little power — and how did you respond to it?
  • What would it look like for you to intentionally listen for God's voice in the margins of a familiar story, rather than at its center?
  • Naaman had to let people he outranked be right, and himself be wrong, in front of everyone. When has humility like that been costly for you?
  • Is there a girl or young person in your life who needs to hear, clearly and often, that her story, her body, and her voice matter?
0 Comments

"The Mantle and the Question"

7/27/2026

0 Comments

 

Where Is God? Crossing the Jordan Again

2 Kings 2:1–15
July 26, 2026
This blog post was generated by AI based on the sermon manuscript and reviewed by Rev. Dr. Stephen M. Fearing. It is not the sermon manuscript itself and may differ from what was preached.

Most of us know the particular ache of a goodbye we can see coming. We know it's near, we're not ready for it, and somewhere in between those two facts we have to find a way to keep walking. That's exactly where the prophet Elisha finds himself in 2 Kings 2, as he walks the last miles of a farewell journey with his mentor Elijah — and it's exactly where many of us find ourselves too, in seasons of transition and loss.

A Goodbye You Can See Coming

Elijah and Elisha set out together on what becomes something of a farewell tour. Along the way, companies of prophets keep intercepting Elisha with the same unsettling question: do you know that today the Lord will take your master from you? Elisha's answer each time amounts to, "Yes, I know. Be quiet." It isn't irritation so much as grief — the sound of someone who knows a goodbye is coming and simply isn't ready for it yet.

That feeling is worth sitting with for a moment: the ache of anticipated loss, the wish to hold time still just a little longer. Before diving into the text, it can help to bring to mind someone who "loved you into being," as Mr. Rogers used to say — someone who taught you deeply, whose counsel you still wish you could seek. The range of feelings that memory stirs — sadness, gratitude, peace, longing — is close to what Elisha must have carried as he walked toward the Jordan with Elijah.

A Bold and Wise Request

When they finally reach the river, Elijah turns to Elisha and asks what he can do for him before he's taken away — a question echoing God's ask of Solomon back in 1 Kings. Elisha's response is striking: he wants a double portion of Elijah's ruach, his spirit or breath — the very word used for the Spirit of God hovering over the waters at creation. It's a bold request, but a wise one, not unlike Solomon's own ask for a listening heart rather than wealth or long life.

Elisha is essentially saying to Elijah: "Whatever measure of God's presence you carry, I want that — and then I want even more of it."

Elijah doesn't offer an easy yes. What he can promise isn't fully his to give — it belongs to God. But if Elisha witnesses him being taken, it will be granted. Then Elijah strikes the Jordan with his rolled-up mantle, the waters part, and the two cross on dry ground, echoing the parting of the Red Sea generations before.

An Extraordinary Send-Off

Once they've crossed, Elijah is taken up — not, as it turns out, riding in a fiery chariot, but with a chariot of fire simply appearing between the two men as Elijah ascends. It's a small textual detail, but a telling one: the drama belongs to God's action, not to any vehicle. Either way, the departure is more dramatic than even Moses received. As Elijah vanishes, Elisha cries out, "Father! Father!" — whether directed toward God or toward the mentor who shaped him, it's clearly the cry of someone losing the person who meant everything to him.

Then comes silence — the particular silence that follows saying goodbye to someone we love. And then, inevitably, the question: okay, now what? Elisha picks up the mantle that has fallen, realizing it now belongs to him.

When the Mantle Doesn't Work — At First

Here's a detail easy to miss: Elisha is now stranded on the wrong side of the Jordan, the water having closed behind him. He has to part it himself. He strikes the water with his new mantle — and nothing happens. The river stays exactly as it was.

Many of us know that moment intimately: when the mantle has been passed to us, when we step into the work we've trained for, and it simply doesn't work — at least not the first time. Returning recently from a hymn-writing conference, thoughts turned to a mentor and "Elijah" of sorts — someone who taught the craft of hymn writing and passed away a few years ago. Sorting back through a decade of hymns written since, separating the ones worth keeping from the ones that will mercifully never see daylight, brought that same feeling close: this is mine to carry now — and it doesn't always work the first time we try.

Elisha, in that moment of frustration, asks a different question: "Where is the Lord, the God of Elijah?" He strikes the water again. This time it parts, and he crosses.

The Right Question to Ask

When we lose someone who shaped how we understand God's love, justice, and kindness, it's tempting to ask, "Where are they now?" Remembering the people who loved us into being matters — it's worth doing. But notice what Elisha doesn't ask. He doesn't ask, "Where is Elijah?" That question only looks backward. Instead he asks, "Where is God?" Where is God leading now?

Don't ask where I am. Ask where God is.

This community, like so many others, has walked through its own season of transition — saying goodbye to remarkable pillars of the congregation, even as many individuals carry their own liminal grief for people loved deeply and lost. It is okay to be sad. It is okay to grieve. It is okay to feel gratitude alongside the ache. And those we've lost are, in a very real sense, cheering us on toward the better question: not "where are they," but "where is God, here and now?"

As the mantle passes to each of us in turn, may that be the question we keep asking, in both our grief and our gratitude — because God is present on both sides of the Jordan as we cross it again.

Questions for Reflection

  1. Who is someone who "loved you into being," and what would it mean to honor their memory by asking where God is leading you now, rather than only looking back?
  2. Elisha's request for a double portion of Elijah's spirit was bold, but also specific — not wealth, not comfort, but presence. What would it look like for you to ask boldly for more of God's presence in your life right now?
  3. Have you ever had a "first strike" moment — stepping into a role, responsibility, or calling that had been handed to you, only to have it fail before it worked? How did you respond?
  4. In your own seasons of transition or loss, has your instinct been to ask "where did they go?" or "where is God leading me now?" What might change if you leaned more toward the second question?
  5. Where do you sense God might be present on "the other side of the Jordan" — in a change, ending, or transition you're currently facing?
0 Comments

"What Are You Doing Here?"

7/1/2026

0 Comments

 

Look for Your Geese: Finding the Still, Small Voice in Faith Fatigue

1 Kings 19:1–18
June 28, 2026 — Fifth Sunday after Pentecost
This blog post was generated by AI based on the sermon manuscript and reviewed by Rev. Dr. Stephen M. Fearing. It is not the sermon manuscript itself and may differ from what was preached.

Have you ever felt so worn down by the state of the world that you just wanted to run away? That feeling has a name: faith fatigue. It's the ache of doing your best to follow Jesus and love your neighbor, only to watch injustice keep piling up anyway. This week's reflection, drawn from the prophet Elijah's flight into the wilderness, offers no easy fix for that ache — but it does offer a place to start: rest, a still small voice, and the reminder that none of us are meant to carry this alone.

A Different Kind of Sunday

This sermon comes a little differently than usual. After a week at the Montreat Music and Worship Conference spent listening more than writing, the reflections that follow are offered less as a polished manuscript and more as honest thoughts on wrapping up this first leg of a summer series through 1 and 2 Kings.

One phrase from a sermon heard that week, preached by the Rev. Dr. Brian Blount, president emeritus of Union Presbyterian Seminary, set the tone for everything that follows: faith fatigue. It's that particular exhaustion that comes from trying, in our own imperfect way, to be agents of good in the world — individually and as a church — and watching things not go in a good direction anyway.

Elijah's Flight

Elijah knew this fatigue well. Fresh off his triumphant showdown with the prophets of Baal on Mount Carmel — a moment when God showed up in dramatic, undeniable fashion — Elijah found himself running for his life the very next day, chased by Queen Jezebel's death threat. Despondent, he collapsed under a broom tree in the wilderness and prayed for God to simply let him die.

What did God send in response? Not a rebuke. Not a new assignment. An angel with a very practical message.

You need a nap and a snack.

That's it. Rest, a freshly baked cake, and water — provision enough to sustain Elijah for forty days and forty nights on his journey to Mount Horeb. Sometimes the most spiritual thing we can do is admit we need a pity party, a nap, and something to eat.

Not in the Wind, Not in the Fire

At Horeb, Elijah witnessed a great wind, an earthquake, and a fire — but God was not found in any of them. God came instead in a sound of sheer silence, a still small voice, asking a simple question: "What are you doing here?"

That question isn't shame. It's an invitation — the kind of gentle, searching question God asks all of us when we need to pause, reflect, and rejuvenate before returning to the work of justice, humility, and kindness. We are not made for endless striving without rest.

A Relay, Not a Solo Marathon

After Elijah's rest, God gave him new marching orders: go anoint others, including the prophet Elisha, who would come alongside him to share the mantle of leadership. The message underneath that instruction is one worth sitting with:

I called you to do something, but I never called you to do it alone.

The life of faith isn't a solo marathon we're meant to finish by ourselves. It's a relay race — one where we run our leg, rest when we need to, and pass the baton to those who come after us. We are surrounded by a great cloud of witnesses who ran before us, and we will hand the baton to those who come next. We may not see the race finished in our lifetime, and that's part of what it means to live by faith.

Look for Your Geese

Sometimes the still, small voice shows up in the most unexpected places. During a loud, frightening thunderstorm, a backyard full of geese — the kind that had become a beloved, if messy, fixture of home — stayed calm and quiet even as the heavens thundered around them. In that stillness was a reminder: God's still, small voice is present right in the middle of the noise and chaos of life, if we're willing to look for it.

Whatever your own "geese" might be — whatever ordinary, unassuming place where you glimpse God's steadiness in the middle of the storm — look for it. Trust it. Let it call you back to where God is calling you to be.

As we close every worship service at Guilford Park, we're reminded: we are not obligated to complete the work, but neither are we free to abandon it. The still, small voice is calling. It's worth listening for.

Questions for Reflection

  1. When have you felt something like "faith fatigue" — worn down by trying to do good in a world that doesn't seem to be responding? How did you respond to that feeling?
  2. Elijah's first answer from God wasn't a command, but rest and food. Where in your own life might God be inviting you to simply rest before doing anything else?
  3. God asked Elijah, "What are you doing here?" If you sat with that same question today, what would your honest answer be?
  4. Who has been part of your "relay team" in the life of faith — someone who has carried the baton before you, or someone you are helping carry it now?
  5. What are your "geese" — the ordinary, unexpected places where you've noticed God's still, small voice in the middle of noise or chaos?
0 Comments

"Limping" Between Two Opinions

6/23/2026

0 Comments

 

"Limping" Between Two Opinions

1 Kings 18:20–40

June 21, 2026  |  4th Sunday after Pentecost (Year A)

This blog post was generated by AI based on the sermon manuscript and reviewed by Rev. Dr. Stephen M. Fearing. It is not the sermon manuscript itself and may differ from what was preached.

What happens when a people who know exactly who God is still can't quite bring themselves to act like it? That is the question at the heart of one of scripture's most dramatic showdowns — and it turns out, it's a question that hasn't gone out of style.

A Drought That Had a Reason

By the time Elijah arrives at Mount Carmel, the northern kingdom of Israel has been suffering through more than three years without rain. The drought wasn't random. Under King Ahab — described by scripture as more provoking to God than any king before him — the Israelites had abandoned their covenant faith and taken up the worship of Baal, the Sidonian fertility god his foreign wife Jezebel had brought with her. The drought, in other words, was a divine indictment. It was the landscape reflecting back the spiritual condition of the people.

When Elijah finally confronts Ahab, Ahab calls him "the troubler of Israel." It's a classic case of projection — accusing someone else of the very thing you're guilty of. Elijah doesn't flinch: "I have not troubled Israel; you have troubled Israel." With that, the stage is set for the contest on Mount Carmel.

The Contest on the Mountain

The setup is almost theatrical in its boldness. On one side: 450 prophets of Baal. On the other: Elijah, alone, representing the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Israel. Two altars. Two bulls. Two teams. Whichever god answers by fire wins.

Baal's prophets go first. For hours they cry out, dance, and eventually cut themselves in desperation. Nothing happens. Elijah watches — and then starts to taunt them. He suggests that maybe Baal is meditating. Or napping. Or has, shall we say, stepped away for a moment. The mockery is pointed: a god who cannot hear is no god at all.

Elijah then douses his own altar with water — once, twice, three times — filling even the trench around it. He wants no doubt about what is about to happen. Then he prays, simply and directly, for God to be known. Fire falls from heaven, consuming altar, wood, stones, dust, and every drop of water. The people fall on their faces: "The Lord indeed is God; the Lord indeed is God."

Waffling Between Two Opinions

Before the contest begins, Elijah addresses the crowd with a question that cuts to the bone:

"How long will you go limping with two different opinions? If the Lord is God, follow him; but if Baal, then follow him."

The Hebrew word behind "limping" is pesach — it means the inability to walk straight and upright. It's important to say clearly: Elijah is not talking about physical disability or the way any person's body moves through the world. He's describing something chosen — a deliberate spiritual performance. The prophets of Baal are choosing to limp around the altar as a kind of religious theater. And the people of Israel are choosing to divide their loyalty between two incompatible allegiances, hedging their bets by trying to worship whichever god seems most useful at the moment.

That's the limp Elijah is condemning: not a body's limitation, but a soul's divided loyalty. It is, as Joshua put it generations earlier, the refusal to choose whom you will serve — to let your yes be yes and your no be no.

A Pattern We Recognize

It would be easy to place this story safely in the ancient past. But the divided allegiance Elijah describes has never really gone away. We stumble when we say "blessed are the peacemakers" and simultaneously fund the largest military apparatus in human history without question. We waffle when we pray "forgive us our debts" while participating in economic systems designed to keep people trapped in endless cycles of debt. We waver when we confess that the earth is the Lord's but treat creation as a resource to be extracted rather than a gift to be tended. We straddle two opinions when we call Jesus "Lord" while reserving our deepest loyalty for whichever party or politician promises to protect what we already have.

None of us is immune. Some of our divided loyalties are conscious; some of them we don't even see yet. The invitation of this passage is not condemnation — it's clarity. Where, in your life, are you walking with a split heart?

The Faithfulness That Ends the Drought

Here is the good news this text carries, and it is real: while pesach in the Old Testament is always used to describe human behavior, it is never used to describe God's. God does not waver. God does not hedge. God is faithful — to the poor and the downtrodden, to the immigrant and the stranger, to every person caught in the droughts and crises that our own patterns of complicity have helped to create.

And droughts do come to an end. The same passage that begins with years of parched earth ends with fire from heaven and rain pouring down. When we stop stumbling between allegiances and begin living our faith with integrity — when we dare, as the prophet Amos dreamed, to let justice roll down like water and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream — something changes. Not just in us. In the world around us.

There is a time to compromise. And there is a time to choose. May we, by God's grace, know the difference.

Questions for Reflection

  1. Where in your own life do you sense a "divided loyalty" — a place where you say one thing but find yourself doing another? What would it look like to take a clearer stance?
  2. Elijah challenged the Israelites to stop "playing both sides" and choose whom they would serve. What does that kind of commitment look like in practical, daily terms for you?
  3. The sermon names several ways modern people waver between allegiances — militarism, debt, creation care, nationalism. Which of those resonates most with your own experience or struggle?
  4. Elijah acted with remarkable boldness and even humor in the face of overwhelming odds. What gives you confidence — or makes it hard — to take a faithful stand when the odds feel stacked against you?
  5. The text ends with drought giving way to rain. What "drought" in your life, your community, or our world are you hoping and working to see ended?
0 Comments

The Voices We Heed

6/14/2026

0 Comments

 

Who Are You Listening To?

1 Kings 12:1–17

Third Sunday after Pentecost · June 14, 2026

This blog post was generated by AI based on the sermon manuscript and reviewed by Rev. Dr. Stephen M. Fearing. It is not the sermon manuscript itself and may differ from what was preached.

Last week we stood with Solomon as he stretched his arms toward heaven and dedicated the newly built Temple, the high point of his reign. This week, we discover just how quickly the glory cracked. A kingdom fractures, a king refuses to listen, and we are left with a question that lands as squarely on us as it did on Rehoboam: when we say we have a “listening heart,” whose voices are we actually choosing to hear?

When Glory Turned to Gold

Solomon tasted glory, and like almost everyone who tastes that kind of power, he wanted more. He began covering everything in gold, building an empire of opulence that the rest of the world was expected to admire. Somewhere along the way, the lev shomeya—the “listening heart” God had granted him back in chapter three—started tuning in to a different voice. Solomon began listening to the god of gold rather than the God of neighborliness.

Here’s the irony: much of what Solomon did was likely done with good intentions, all in the name of national strength and prosperity. But he forgot the Torah’s mandate of neighborliness. To put it in modern terms, a booming stock market doesn’t necessarily mean the hungry are being fed, the naked clothed, or the homeless housed. His building projects ran on forced labor and were funded by crushing taxes that fell hardest on the poor.

“It is odd and noteworthy that the steps taken toward security produce more anxiety. The provisions for happiness produce more tension.”
— Walter Brueggemann, on Solomon’s folly

By the time Solomon died, the people had had enough. The kingdom he tried to make “great” had only widened the gap between the haves and the have-nots, and those chickens were about to come home to roost.

A King and His Two Councils

The crown passed to Solomon’s son, Rehoboam, and trouble stirred almost immediately. The northern tribes came to him with a simple, weary request: lighten the yoke. Ease the forced labor. Cut the taxes. “Do that,” they said, “and we will serve you.”

Rehoboam took the question to two very different groups. First came the old guard—advisors who remembered the days before his father grew drunk on power. Their counsel was wise and humble: be a servant to these people, speak good words to them, and they will be loyal to you forever. Rehoboam mulled it over and remained unconvinced.

Then he turned to the younger men, who had known nothing but the glitter of Solomon’s reign. They told him exactly what he wanted to hear: don’t back down, double down. They even handed him a taunt for the northern tribes--“My little finger is thicker than my father’s loins”—an insult I’ll let you decode for yourself. Their entitlement was music to Rehoboam’s ears. He chose the flattery, the people revolted, and the kingdom split in two.

The Difference a Rival Makes

Rehoboam, I’d argue, did inherit his father’s “listening heart.” But he learned the hard way what many of us are learning today: a listening heart is no moral compass at all unless we make the intentional choice to listen to voices that challenge us, stretch us, and offer a perspective we don’t already hold.

Years ago I read Doris Kearns Goodwin’s Team of Rivals, which chronicles how Abraham Lincoln deliberately filled his cabinet with former political rivals—people who disagreed with him sharply. In the middle of a nation tearing itself apart over slavery, Lincoln did the exact opposite of Rehoboam. Where Rehoboam gathered “yes men,” Lincoln gathered people who would tell him no. Was it messy? Absolutely. Did it work every time? Of course not. But Lincoln understood what Rehoboam discovered too late: a leader who listens only to what he wants to hear is no leader at all.

Naming the Voices We Heed

Few of us will ever be president or king. But every one of us is a leader—in our families, our friendships, our workplaces, our church. We lead simply by representing Christ wherever we go. And we are stronger when we listen to a wide range of voices and, together, discern which ones are leading us in a faithful direction.

Because not all voices are of God. Some voices tell us to turn against one another, to treat our neighbors with suspicion, to give in to selfish individualism. Listening to a voice is not the same as heeding it. So this week, I invite your lev shomeya to get honest:

Who am I listening to? Who am I not listening to? What voices have been pushed to the side?

In a few short weeks our nation will mark its 250th anniversary—for many of us, a time of real celebration. Hear me clearly: we don’t have to choose between being Christian and being patriotic. But part of being patriotic Christians is having honest conversations about our nation’s own listening heart. Who has this nation heard, and who has it dismissed, disparaged, and dehumanized over 250 years? All kingdoms rise and fall in time; only God’s faithfulness remains. We can give thanks for what is good and just in our country while still tuning our hearts to those for whom “liberty and justice for all” has not yet come true.

We close, as we did in worship, by tuning our listening hearts and our singing voices to the prayer of the hymn “O God of Every Nation”:

From search of wealth and power and scorn of truth and right,
from trust in bombs that shower destruction through the night,
from pride of race and station and blindness to your way,
deliver every nation, eternal God, we pray.

Questions for Reflection

  1. When you picture your own “circle of advisors”—the voices you actually take to heart—who is in it, and who is missing?
  2. Rehoboam preferred flattery to wisdom. Where in your own life is it tempting to listen only to what you want to hear?
  3. What is the difference between listening to a voice and heeding it? How do you discern which voices are leading you in a faithful direction?
  4. Solomon pursued security and glory and ended up with more anxiety, not less. Where have you seen that pattern—in the world, or in yourself?
  5. As our nation approaches its 250th anniversary, whose voices do you think it most needs to hear right now?
0 Comments

Can God Be Contained?

6/7/2026

0 Comments

 

Can God Be Contained?

1 Kings 8:22–30

June 8, 2026 — 2nd Sunday after Pentecost (Year A)

This blog post was generated by AI based on the sermon manuscript and reviewed by Rev. Dr. Stephen M. Fearing. It is not the sermon manuscript itself and may differ from what was preached.

We build beautiful places to meet God — and we should. But what happens when the very places we build for holy encounter start to feel like the only places God can be found? In his prayer at the dedication of the Jerusalem Temple, King Solomon says something unexpected, something that cuts against the grand occasion of the moment. And it still cuts, all these centuries later.

The Heavens Are Your Tabernacle

The anthem this morning opened the door beautifully: the heavens are your tabernacle, God of glory beyond our galaxy. It is a stunning theological claim — that the God we worship is not ceiling-bound, not contained within any single roof, no matter how high its arches climb or how exquisitely its stained glass catches the morning light.

And yet — we build spaces. We gather in them. We fill them with meaning and memory and love. There is nothing wrong with that. Some of the world's most extraordinary places of worship — St. Peter's Basilica in Rome, the Hagia Sophia in Istanbul, Washington National Cathedral, Duke Chapel, Riverside Church in Manhattan — bear witness to the human impulse to craft something beautiful, something fitting, for an encounter with the holy.

And then there is this space. Humble in square footage, yes — but full of a different kind of grandeur. Pews with hand-carved ends, shaped by members of this congregation nearly seventy-five years ago. A communion table built by Rick Cromer, who was sung to heaven just over a year ago. Stained-glass windows purchased in the 1950s for $600 that have caught the light faithfully ever since. This sanctuary is woven through with the prayers, the tears, and the joy of generations. It is a holy place.

Solomon's Curveball

So it is significant that Solomon, at the very moment of the temple's grand dedication — after years of construction, after gathering all of Israel together in this culminating act of worship — pauses and says something that sounds almost like a warning against the whole project:

But will God indeed dwell on the earth? Even heaven and the highest heaven cannot contain you, much less this house that I have built.

That is a remarkable thing to say at a ribbon-cutting ceremony. Solomon is not dismissing the temple. He is not saying the effort was wasted, the worship hollow, the gathering pointless. He is saying something more subtle and more important: this place points toward God, but it cannot hold God.

The Temptation to Domesticate the Holy

Scholar Walter Brueggemann has written extensively about the way institutions — including religious ones — can, without ever intending to, attempt to manage and domesticate the divine. The temple becomes the place where God lives, where God can be accessed on our terms, visited on our schedule. What begins as a beautiful act of devotion can quietly become an act of possession.

Solomon knew the danger. And most of us, if we're honest, have felt the pull ourselves — the subtle assumption that God is more present here on Sunday morning than in the difficult Tuesday afternoon conversations, the hospital rooms, the veterinary offices where we say goodbye to beloved animals, the kitchen tables where families sit with spreadsheets and worry about groceries and rent.

But God dwells there, too. God dwelt there, too — beside the bed of a beloved church member in his final days, where a family gathered and sang There Is a Balm in Gilead. God dwells in the auditorium where graduates wonder what comes next. God will dwell wherever today's communion bread is carried after worship, to those who are sick and homebound.

Come to the Table — And Then Leave with God

This is part of what makes communion so profound. We share it mostly in this room — but not always — because this beautiful space draws us together to dwell with God, and then we are sent out. We leave with God. God goes with us.

The assignment for today is a simple one: come to this table exactly as you are — with whatever brokenness you carry, whatever joy, whatever burden. Meet God here, really here. And then carry the God you meet in this place out into all the places in the world where God already dwells and is already waiting for you.

The heavens are God's tabernacle. We cannot contain the holy. But we can, with gratitude and humility, point toward it — and then go where it leads.

Questions for Reflection

  1. Are there places — beyond your church building — where you have unexpectedly encountered God? What was it about that moment or space that felt holy?
  2. Solomon praised the temple and then immediately acknowledged its limits. How do you hold together deep love for a particular place of worship with the recognition that God cannot be contained there?
  3. Walter Brueggemann warns that our sacred spaces can become places where we try to "manage and possess" the holy. Have you ever experienced that temptation — personally or collectively? What does it look like?
  4. Where, this week, do you expect to carry the God you meet at the communion table? Where might God already be waiting for you?
  5. This sanctuary carries the memory and labor of generations — carvings, windows, a handmade table. How does tangible, physical history shape your experience of worship?
0 Comments
<<Previous

    Rev. Dr. Stephen M. Fearing

    Rev. Dr. Stephen M. Fearing is the Head of Staff of Guilford Park Presbyterian Church.

    Archives

    August 2026
    July 2026
    June 2026
    May 2026
    April 2026
    March 2026
    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Contact

MAILING ADDRESS: 2100 FERNWOOD DRIVE
PHONE: 336-288-5452
EMAIL: [email protected]
OFFICE HOURS: MON-THU 9-5

Stay Connected​

subscribe to enews
calendar
guidepost Newsletter
blog
social media

Members

church manual
member connect
prayer concerns form